The Old Goat Project

A groove is a good thing, unless it’s a golf swing that is carved deep, like scar tissue, into the brain and muscle and soul of a tortured golfer. There’s no trick to what the Old Goat needs, and no shortcuts allowed.

The Old Goat Project, Update 3: Take it to the course

(From March 2011)

I didn’t realize how much I missed the dude until I hit golf balls in front of him for the first time in a month. Family business took Tom Staskus to California, during which time I practiced about as much as anybody would who knows he doesn’t have to get in front of the teacher for a while.

But I did practice, and though I thought I’d been practicing right, it took about two swings for Staskus to pinpoint one or a half-dozen issues.

Staskus

First, and always foremost, are the feet, the engines of the lower body that power the turning of the torso while the arms and hands that hold the club go with the flow. I didn’t know it, but I was passive with my feet and lower body, and that left all the work to the arms.

I wasn’t getting to the right place at the top, because I was not letting the shoulder turn take the club back, but rather lifting my arms to places from which I could not possibly start down on any path but outside-in. Call it what you like: Casting, over-the-top, terrible, horrible, with few possible outcomes other than weak ones.

Even when he’s being pretty specific, Staskus likes to keep it simple. When he’s speaking generally, he’s even simpler: You don’t have to swing hard to hit it hard; watch the club hit the ball; and finish your swing. So take it to the course, dumbass.

The golf ball is the dimpled innocent in all of this, sitting in perfect stillness, with no choice but to let the physics of its collision with the club to play out.

Our practice session a week ago Saturday was our best yet. Something clicked, and Dr. Tom had the rare experience of feeling like he’d gotten through to me.

Test No. 1 – Feb. 22, 2011
I couldn’t have forecasted the nice, then the awful, followed by the mostly OK and the pretty bad. And then there was the weather.

I was on No. 5 at Tumwater Valley, in my first round of golf since October, when we segued into the hail-blowing-sideways portion of the program. It was a good time to break for lunch.

At that point, I had just striped my drive and followed up with a pretty good fairway wood. I never found that ball – in seconds it was camouflaged by hailstones.

I was sorry to stop right then, because I was beginning to feel like it was feeling like I felt it should feel like when it’s feeling right.

He can tell me and tell me, Staskus had said, and it won’t mean a thing until I feel it.

I went back out after lunch, during which time the sun came out for a minute. I got in 12 holes, and it felt good. Not bad for openers.

Test No. 2 – March 6, 2011
Eagles Pride at Fort Lewis was pretty in the half-sunlight in my first round with other people and a scorecard since this project started. My game was not half bad about half the time.

Staskus had worked me hard the day before, with more golf swings, with and without a ball, in quick succession, than in any previous lesson.

Even when he’s being pretty specific, Staskus likes to keep it simple. When he’s speaking generally, he’s even simpler: You don’t have to swing hard to hit it hard; watch the club hit the ball; and finish your swing. So take it to the course, dumbass.

I wrote down all the big numbers on the front nine, and they added up to a really big number. It wasn’t all bad – there were a few times I heard the “snick” of a well-struck ball – but too often it was back to bad habits.

On the back nine, I started swinging easier and stopped swaying back on my takeaway (I tried to “stay in my hip,” in Staskus’s words) and I broke 50, with a few strokes to spare.

Not perfect, but it never will be. My misses were better, and that I count as progress.

###

The Project: To break an old goat’s bad habits and rebuild a reliable, repeatable golf swing for writer Bart Potter.

The Task: Huge.

The Student: Lateish 50s; 6-foot-4; loves golf, hates playing bad golf; USGA handicap index 26.0.

The Teacher: Tom Staskus, 52; PGA professional since 1998.

Short-term Goal: To break 90.

Long-term Goal: To shrink the student’s handicap index to 18 or lower.

The Timeframe: However long it takes

The Old Goat Project, Update 2: It’s all in the feet

We had been clear about the concept of working from the ground up – starting with putting, progressing (I presumed) through chipping and pitching, and then to the full swing.

Potter

Lately, Tom Staskus (the teacher in this little drama) has taken me from putting right into a swing that’s as close to full as it needs to be right now.  It’s not out of sequence at all – we’re still on the ground. It’s all in the feet, man.

If the feet aren’t working, the hips aren’t turning, the weight’s not shifting from the back leg to the front, and therefore it’s impossible that your arms and the hands that hold the golf club are working in synch with your body. It’s like a slow dance with a loved one, Dr. Tom says. Don’t force it, just go with it. It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that swing.

When I feel that feeling in the longer swing, the teacher says, I’ll be able to find the same rhythm in the short-game swing.

“Not bad, kiddo,” Staskus said after a recent session. “I like the pace we’re going.”

Staskus

It’s too easy, in severe middle age, to stop trying to learn, to stop seeking out the people who have something to teach us. Golf, in this case, is the subject of choice, and relearning how to learn is at least as important, in the greater scheme, as hitting a golf ball.

He calls me “kiddo” and I have to laugh. I’m older than he is. But you take your mentors where you find them, and you learn your lessons as well as you are open to the teaching of them.

The Old Goat Project, Update 1: Why not be in control?

The Project: To break an old goat’s bad habits and rebuild a reliable, repeatable golf swing for writer Bart Potter.

Potter

The Task: Huge.
The Student: Lateish-50s; 6-foot-4; loves golf, hates playing bad golf; USGA handicap index 26.0.

Staskus

The Teacher: Tom Staskus, 52; PGA professional since 1998.
Short-term Goal: To break 90.
Long-term Goal: To shrink the student’s handicap index to 18 or lower.
The Timeframe: However long it takes.

 

In this space, we’ll first recap the earliest lessons of the Old Goat Project. Stay tuned as we bring it into real time.

(From December 27, 2010)  THE OLD GOAT PROJECT pairs a seasoned teacher, Olympia, Wash., professional Tom Staskus, with a student who’s lost his golf groove, if he ever had one. Early work – some nine hours of practice and lots of conversation about putting – has yielded promising results.

The teacher: The student didn’t practice in the week between yesterday and the previous session, so Staskus, who was inclined to move into some chipping and longer swing work, kept the whole lesson on the indoor green.

From the ground up, the student built on concepts introduced in prior lessons:

  • Weight spread evenly over feet;
  • Firm legs and core, held still through the stroke;
  • Solid grip, one that won’t let the wrists break down or the fingers guide the club;
  • Shoulder turn controls the swing back and through the ball.

As the lesson went on, a theme emerged: “Why not be in control of the situation?”

By this, Staskus meant reducing the possibility for breakdowns in the club path. In his own putting, he takes a tiny backswing and strikes the ball firmly, rather than pushing it, and the ball rolls crisply to the hole.

When every element of the putting stroke – the stance, the grip, the turn – is of a piece, it can only enhance the control a player has over the situation that arises on every putting green of every round of golf.

The student: I didn’t make the time to practice between last Saturday and this Monday. The case could be made that family comes first during the holidays, and man, it’s busy, you know?

But I want to hold up my end of the bargain, and that means putting in the work and being honest when I don’t.

It’s completely absorbing: the hours roll by, and Staskus is patient. He doesn’t want to tell me, necessarily, what I’m doing wrong. He would prefer that I feel and recognize where a breakdown, no matter how small, might have pushed or pulled the ball by the hole. It’s getting there.

It’s eye-opening to realize all the different reasons I missed putts in the past. What is more amazing is that I ever made a putt at all.

The Old Goat Project: Reclamation of a golf game

The Project: To break an old goat’s bad habits and rebuild a reliable, repeatable golf swing for writer Bart Potter.

Potter

The Task: Huge.
The Student: Lateish-50s; 6-foot-4; loves golf, hates playing bad golf; USGA handicap index 26.0.

Staskus

The Teacher: Tom Staskus, 52; PGA professional since 1998.
Short-term Goal: To break 90.
Long-term Goal: To shrink the student’s handicap index to 18 or lower.
The Timeframe: However long it takes.

 

THE DISHEARTENED, disenchanted golfer back in late 2010 had had it. He was done.

He was off golf, through with it, ready to turn to more worthy endeavors – unless something radical was to happen. Did he have the time, the patience, the guts, to do what it takes to make a real change in his golf game?

He was about to find out.

Call it The Old Goat Project.

The golfer in question, if there was any doubt, is the name of the proprietor of this Website. He never, in three years writing a newspaper golf column and another year as a blogger, wanted his (my) game to be the subject matter. There’s nothing interesting in a golfer’s navel-gazing or, worse, trying to be funny about his own golf game.

Funny as it might be.

The Old Goat Project grew out of an offer by Tom Staskus, a PGA professional, accomplished player and dedicated teacher of golf, to work with me to rebuild a game – and chart the progress here.

“This is the hardest sport there is,” Staskus says, “no doubt about it.”

We launched the project, and for several months we met regularly at the golf learning center where Staskus did his teaching. Life intervened — professional changes and schedule challenges for the student, a new entrepreneurial venture for the teacher — so for a year we worked barely at all. The student’s golf swing did not benefit from the neglect.

Now, we’re back at it. Staskus now owns the golf learning center — read more here — and is thus busier than ever. But we’re doing this thing.

In this space, we’ll first recap those early lessons, where good work was done. Stay tuned as we bring it into real time.

_____

We met for our first session on Dec. 9, 2010. I’d been instructed to bring my golf bag, but we didn’t come close to using the whole of it. We started with the putter, because we’re working from the ground up, Staskus says – putting, then miniature swings, and only down the road longer swings.

The first thing Staskus did was look at my putter – to see if the instrument might be any impediment to the player being the best putter he can be.

We looked at my putting “routine,” which is distinguished by never looking the same way twice. We firmed up my setup, got me standing a little closer to the ball at address (which had the effect of making my putter flatter to the ground) and worked on stillness in my core over the ball, which is harder than it sounds.

Staskus likes it simple – good balance and a squared clubface through the ball. What works in putting works in chipping and works in driving the ball.

There are many paths to the plunk of the ball hitting the bottom of the hole. My teacher doesn’t plan to dictate to me all the hows and whys – however comfortable I was in my old ways, he wants me to get comfortable in new, better ways that work for me.

Staskus’ message, if I can extrapolate from one lesson, is uncluttered by too much golfish geek-speak.

“If I have to try to groove a lot of different moves,” he says, “that’s just too much thinking for me. I like something very simple.”

When Staskus works on his own game, it’s so he can compete and win. He plays for money.

I’ll never play for real money, but I do keep score, every round, and I know what my partners shoot, even if we’re not going head-to-head. For me, The Old Goat Project is not about winning more, though it’s hard not to believe Staskus can help a guy be tougher in a competitive setting.

I’d like to get to a place where I can get out of my head in this most inward of games, to think the right thoughts by effectively thinking no thoughts at all.

If that sounds a little woo-woo, we do have concrete goals for The Old Goat Project. The short-term target is to break 90 for the first time. It’s a threshold I get damnably close to, on a good day, and if that was all I was after I wouldn’t bother with bothering Staskus.

A better, more lasting goal is to make steady incremental reductions in my USGA handicap index. Staskus says I’m selling myself short by setting 18 (bogey golf) as a rough goal: he says he can get me well below that.

If we get there, I’ll say, Tom, you’re a better teacher than I could have imagined.

Staskus is in for the long haul – four or five lessons won’t make a dent. We might do 40 or 50.

“You can’t do anything in life that doesn’t take work,” he says.

The story of a flaky old goat, unwilling to settle for bad golf for the rest of his life, might resonate with somebody out there.

There’s nothing I can do about being flaky and old. What I do about the golf over the life of this project promises to be fun, at the very least, and fun is not a word much associated with my golf game for a very long time.